If you cannot produce it, it does not exist.
Your firm is using AI. Nobody is governing it.
REACH LAW is the governance layer that sits above every AI tool, CRM, and marketing system inside a regulated UK law firm. It does not compete with Harvey, Legora, or Clio. It governs them.
Five-minute diagnostic. Personal liability report. No obligation.
Am I personally liable for the AI I cannot see?
Governance culture is not governance infrastructure.
Training courses, competency frameworks, and AI policies are governance culture. They matter. But they are not what regulators inspect.
Culture tells them what you intended.
Policies, training records, and good intentions describe the firm you meant to run. Under inspection, intention is not evidence. City firms describe an AI governance culture. Almost none can produce the auditable proof behind it.
Infrastructure proves what you did.
Auditable logs. Timestamped decisions. A named human accountable for every AI-enabled action that left the firm. The COLP who cannot produce that within 24 hours of an SRA request is the most exposed person in the building.
"The gap is not between firms that use AI and firms that do not. It is between firms that can prove their governance and firms that cannot."
Where does your firm sit today?
Five levels. One question.
Every firm sits somewhere on the exposure ladder. Most COLPs believe they are higher than they are, because culture feels like control. The diagnostic scores you against evidence, not intention.
Move through the levels to see what each one means when the request for evidence actually arrives.
Indefensible
Ungoverned AI in daily use. No registry, no logs, no named accountability. An inspection request cannot be answered. The COLP carries the full exposure personally.
When the regulator asks, can we produce it?
Not the policy. The evidence. This is what governed compliance looks like when it has to be produced on demand.
The fines are real. The sources are named.
Zero fabrication. Every figure below traces to a primary regulator publication or court record.
What REACH LAW actually is.
It is not
- a tool
- a platform
- a software application
- a compliance guarantee
- an AI that decides for you
It is
Human-led governance infrastructure. The accountability layer that sits above your entire AI ecosystem and makes every action within it auditable, defensible, and evidenced. REACH LAW does not decide what is compliant. It proves how compliance decisions were made.
They each govern a room. We govern the building.
Harvey, Legora, Clio and the rest each govern their own output. Not one governs the cross-platform AI ecosystem, BD and marketing, or the production of evidence for a regulator. REACH LAW is the layer that sits above them all.
Compare any single tool against the layer above.
Keep every tool you use. Close the gap around them.
REACH LAW is not a replacement for any of these. Every one becomes a governed node: catalogued, risk-rated, and attributed to a named human. Keep using them. Close the exposure gap they leave behind.
One infrastructure. Every authority.
Your current tools address one regulator at best. REACH LAW governs across all six core authorities and the statutory frameworks beneath them.
Principles 1–7, Code of Conduct, Regulation 19 COLP accountability, AML supervision.
UK GDPR, PECR, the Data (Use and Access) Act 2025, AI data-processing obligations.
Consumer Duty, SM&CR, and the AML supervision transition now in active legislation.
AI-generated marketing content. Three law-firm enforcement actions in September 2025.
Sanctions screening obligations against the daily consolidated list, at matter level.
Consumer standards, price transparency, obligations on AI-generated claims.
Plus statutory frameworks: MLR 2017 · UK GDPR / DPA 2018 · ECCTA 2023 · SRA Accounts Rules 2019 · Data (Use and Access) Act 2025
Who answers for the firm when the AI is wrong?
One enforcement action, one court criticism, one client complaint over an AI-generated output. The reputational exposure belongs to the firm. This is what governed growth sounds like from the corner office.
You are not buying software. You are making your accountability provable.
The infrastructure flags and alerts.
A named human always decides.
The infrastructure serves human authority and never overrides it. The COLP is the sovereign decision-maker. The SRA holds humans accountable, not infrastructure.
From exposure to governed infrastructure.
Every deployment begins with your firm's own data. No presumptions. No estimates. Your diagnostic answers build your deployment specification.
Priced as infrastructure. Never per seat.
A one-time deployment and a monthly governance retainer. No per-user charges. No metering. Your entire firm is governed for a cost that reflects the scale of your AI ecosystem, not the number of lawyers on your payroll. The tier your firm requires is determined by your diagnostic, not by a sales conversation.
One GX10 unit. Full governance coverage. All six core authorities.
Two GX10 units. 30-second exit-gate latency.
Four GX10 units. Multi-site. 15-minute full scan.
Six GX10 units. Bespoke SLA. Dedicated specialist.
All tiers include identical features and full regulatory coverage. Capacity is the only differentiator. Your diagnostic determines your tier. Pricing is confirmed in your architecture session.
Protect yourself. Protect your firm. Start today.
Your firm is already using AI. The only question is whether you can prove it is governed. Begin your Exposure Diagnostic now, and our governance team will show you exactly where you stand.
Run the Exposure Diagnostic
Eight questions. Five minutes. Your personal liability score across all six core authorities, generated immediately.
Start →A Conversation With Our Governance Team
Thirty minutes with a regulatory governance specialist to walk through your exposure report and confirm whether REACH LAW is right for your firm.
Book →Your Interactive Demo
Your firm name. Your AI tools. REACH LAW running live inside a simulation of your governance ecosystem.
See it →Map your exposure across the SRA, FCA, ICO, ASA, OFSI and CMA in a single profile.
Turn personal regulatory liability into a defensible, evidenced position.
Stand up your governance infrastructure on your own systems, on your terms.
Every enquiry is reviewed by a person, not a queue. Response within one working day.